Work and family

What can an employer offer when the problem is at home?

The employee says it's busy – but the problem is at home. A walk through psychologist schemes, EAP and family benefits: where they arrive too late, and what a layer before them could be.

By Thomas Silkjær4 min read

An employee has started arriving late. She makes mistakes she doesn't usually make, and she says it's busy. But really it is a teenager who has stopped talking, or a relationship about to break. You can see it. You can't ask. And you have nothing to offer until it becomes a sick note.

That is the situation most managers and HR people know, and almost nobody has an answer to. This article is an attempt to lay out the options that exist and point at the gap most of them share.

What you probably already have

The psychologist scheme. Through health insurance or a direct agreement. It works when someone needs it, and it is the right answer once the strain has become a treatment need. The problem isn't the scheme. The problem is that it assumes the employee has already admitted it is bad enough and has the nerve to use it. Many wait too long.

EAP and helplines. Anonymous counselling by phone or chat, often with a limited number of sessions. Good for acute relief, but still something you call when you have got that far.

Flexibility. Working from home, reduced hours, care days. Indispensable, but flexibility solves logistics. It doesn't solve what happens between two people once they have the time.

Wellbeing surveys. Show how people are doing at work. They don't show why, and they can't see into the home. Nor should they.

The gap in the middle

Put them side by side and a pattern appears. Every offer either requires that it has become a problem, or it is about work rather than about what is actually draining the energy.

There is almost nothing a workplace can offer an employee who is struggling at home before it has become hard enough to call for help. And that is where most of the strain sits. Not in the crisis, but in the months leading up to it where it just nags.

Research on what is called work-family conflict has been clear for decades: strain in the family and at work amplify each other in both directions, and pressure at home comes along to work as reduced concentration, a shorter fuse and more sick days. If you want to do something about it early, the offer has to be able to reach into the family, not just the employee.

What a layer before could look like

The requirements for such an offer are fairly precise if you think it through from the employee's side.

It has to be low-threshold. No referral, no assessment, no conversation with anyone until you want one.

It has to be for the whole family. It is rarely the employee alone who is the problem. It is something between her and her partner, or between her and the eldest.

It has to be genuinely private. Not "we only see aggregated numbers", but nobody at work knows you use it. That is the condition that decides whether people dare. An offer about family life whose usage HR can see will not be used by those who need it most.

And it must not be therapy. It has to be something you can use at home on a Tuesday evening without it feeling like an admission.

What it looks like in practice

Family counselling as an employee benefit is one example that some larger workplaces offer. It is good, but it is still something you book.

Digital conversation tools are another. SAMRUM is one of them: each family member takes a private personality test, and the tool describes the patterns that arise between them in everyday language. No diagnoses, no scores, no data to the employer. The workplace pays for a number of seats, the employee activates access themselves, and the only thing the workplace gets back is a count of how many families have activated.

Whether it is the right tool for you depends on your employees. But the requirements above apply whatever you choose. If an offer cannot answer clearly to "who at work can see that I use this?", it will not be used by the people it is meant for.

What doesn't change

An offer that sits before the psychologist scheme does not give the manager any right to know more about the employee's private life. The manager still shouldn't ask what is going on at home. The difference is that you now have something concrete to point to when an employee says it's busy – and that she can take it up without anyone at work finding out.